“The actual risk of the violence today is that it will
undermine democracy tomorrow.” This quote by S. O’Neil summarizes the overall
effect the Mexican drug cartel is having on American Society. The history of
Mexico is tied to three main categories including, drug trafficking,
immigration, and law enforcement.
There have been many conversations on the topic of the drug
cartel. An example includes “Bishops Urge new strategy in war against drug
cartel “published by America: The National Catholic Weekly. This article argues
for the rebuilding of Mexico in an emotionally powerful way by asking the
Mexican Government “to treat the violence as a public health issue….” On a related
note, William Booth’s article "More Nonmilitary Aid Sought for Drug War:
Clinton Visits Mexico to Review Approach to Fighting Cartels." Published
in The Washington Post in 2010,.outlines a meeting between U.S. Cabinet members
and Mexican officials to discuss the Merida Initiative, a $1.4 Billion program
against drug trafficking. They discussed non-militarized ways to help and
investments designed to strengthen communities and dissuade young people from
enlisting in Cartels. Another example comes rom Alfredo Corchado’s article “A
fighting Chance” He shares the gruesome statistic that there have been more deaths in the drug
war along the Mexican border than there have been United States casualties in
the Iraq war. Because of these issues, immigration rates have been rising.
Proof of rising immigration rates can be found in several
sources including the Stafford Law Review where Alan D Bersin published “El
Tercer Pais: Reinventing the U.S./Mexico Border.” Bersin articulates how
Operation Gate Keeper into effect in the 90’s, and notes the border patrol had
nearly doubled 1994. He further
indicates that INS inspectors have increased to in cooperation with U.S.
Customs. In a similar source, Ted Brader,
Nicholas A.Valentino, and Elizabeth Suhay’s article “Anxiety, Group
Cues, and Immigration Threat” Which appeared in The American Journal of
Political Science looks at how the language of the power elite shapes mass
opinion and response to immigration policy. They confirm the suspicion that
public reaction to immigration costs depends largely upon the identity of the
immigrants.
No comments:
Post a Comment