Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Research Proposal

Amanda Rogers
English 102
Dr. Sonia Begert
April 22, 2014

Research Proposal: Reducing the Rate of Criminal Recidivism
Through Proper Inmate Correctional Courses
Introduction
The United States of America is home to the highest number of incarcerated criminals in the world. The United States holds just 5% of the world’s population, and a shocking 25% of the world’s incarcerated population. Many factors contribute to this dreadful statistic such as the war on drugs, poverty, gang affiliations, and overall violence. Of course, in order to keep a level of justice in society, reduce crime rate, and discourage others from breaking the law, criminals should endure some sort of punishment for their crimes committed. However, I believe it is greatly important to distinguish between the act of being hard on crime and being hard on criminals. Punishment in prison has, unfortunately, become the main focus of the correctional system in America.  When an offender is sent to prison, that offender will have to endure the harsh policies, and troublesome living conditions that are currently in place in our criminal justice system.  Many psychologists believe the dreaded confinement conditions, along with a sever lack of criminal rehabilitation programs, make it extremely difficult for inmates to properly adjust to prison life, and in turn, makes it hard for them to ever improve their lives overall. It is believed that these factors lead a large percentage of prisoners to re-offend both inside and outside of prison walls. This project will be to explore the idea of mandatory rehabilitation and correctional courses for those incarcerated in the United States prison system. I will seek to determine the effect proper rehabilitation and correctional techniques would have on prisoners. My project will be specific to both inmates serving life sentences, and those destined for release. Will correctional courses and techniques alleviate the negative psychological effects of those serving long-term sentences? Ultimately, I will research how such courses may better prepare prisoners for reentry into society, and examine the effect that proper correctional courses would have on the rate of criminal recidivism.

Review of Literature
Sources I have referred to so far include “The Psychological Impact of Incarceration: Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment” by Craig Haney. This is a paper written for the “From Prison to Home Project” which was presented at the National Policy Conference at the National Institutes of Health in December, 2001. The author discusses the many psychological changes that prisoners undergo throughout the course of incarceration. He argues that the psychological harms inflicted on prisoners have increased over the past 10 years due to the harsh policies and non-existent rehabilitation programs.  Haney discusses how these factors affect the post-prison adjustment process for criminals. On the topic of post-prison adjustment, I have reviewed “Prisoner Reentry: Current Trends, Practices, and Issues” By James Austin, from a July, 2001 issue of the Journal of Crime and Delinquency. The author uses national data, and a survey of eight states to examine to current policy of prison re-entry programs, and their effectiveness. He also provides charts and statistics on prison population, and who is participating in certain prison “prerelease” programs. Additionally, I have referred to “Prisoner Reentry and Crime in America”, a book published by the Cambridge University Press and written by colleagues from respected universities. The authors explore the large number of released prisoners each year, and their criminal activity after prison. The main purpose of this book is to examine information regarding the public safety consequences of prisoners who are released back into society. I have also reviewed “Rehabilitate or Punish?” an article written by Etienne Benson for the online version of the APA Monitor, a periodical of the American Psychological Association. In this article, dated July/August, 2003, the author addresses the issue of mental illness in prison, and how psychologist are working to determine the causes of crime and the psychological effects prisoners endure to help shift the focus from punishment to rehabilitation within prison. In a more recent issue of the same periodical, I have referred to an article titled “Alone in ‘The Hole’” written by Kristen Weir. This article, dated May, 2012, addresses the controversial issue of long-term solitary confinement within prisons. The psychological impacts among those in so-called “supermax” prisons are discussed. Another article I have reviewed is from an October 2005 issue of the American Journal of Public Health, and is titled “Behavioral Health Problems, Ex-Offender Reentry Policies, and the ‘Second Chance Act’” This article addresses the significant challenges convicts face once they are released from prison including trouble finding work, housing, and psychological help. The article discusses the “Second Chance Act” which calls for prisoners to have easier access to services such as public assistance, housing, health and mental health services, education, and job training. On the same subject of facing hardships after release from prison, I have referred to “Incarceration in Fragile Families” written by Christopher Wildeman and Bruce Western. This article was featured in the Fall, 2010 issue of “The Future of Children”, a peer-reviewed, biannual publication of The Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and The Brookings Institution. The article discusses the consequences family’s face of those whose loved ones have been released from prison. The authors argue that imprisonment severely diminishes the earnings of adult men which compromises their health and decreases the amount of available family resources. The authors discuss how this can ultimately lead to broken, poverty-stricken families, which may In turn pave the way to delinquent lifestyles for the children of these offenders. On the same topic of families and loved ones affected by the prison system, I have referred to a book titled “The Effects of Imprisonment” which is a publication of the Cambridge Criminal Justice Series. Specifically, I have referenced Chapter 17, titled “The Effects of Imprisonment on Families and Children of Prisoners” written by Joseph Murray. Murray addresses the difficulties faced by the partners of those who are incarcerated such as loss of income, social isolation, trouble with child-care, and difficulties maintaining the relationship. More in-depth research is reviewed on the impact that having an incarcerated parent has on the children of offenders. Another article I have reviewed is tilted “Correctional Education as Democratic Citizenship Education” by Dustin Cantrell from a January, 2013 issue of The Journal of Correctional Education. The author discusses the education programs offered in prison, and the effect they have on prisoners. Cantrell focuses this article around interviews he conducted with educators who have been teaching in prisons for 4-17 years. The educators express the importance of seeking to transform their students into active, aware, engaged citizens which can greatly benefit them post-release. An important source I have included in my research so far is titled “State of Recidivism: The Revolving Door of America’s Prisons” which is written for the Public Safety Performance Project, Published by The PEW Center on the States. This study, dated April, 2011, addresses a broad range of issues relating to the controversial process of mass incarceration. The high cost of prison associated with the recent growth in prison population is addressed. The authors of this study emphasize the “revolving door” effect of criminal recidivism, and how it is adding to the overall cost of prisons. Therefore, this study focuses on criminal re-offending statistics, and what can be done to reduce the rate of criminal recidivism to keep the cost of prison at a minimum.

Research Plan
In addition to the sources I have compiled so far, I would like to continue to find a few more sources from peer-reviewed journals to ensure I have a hold of the most respected literature out there. So far, most of my sources are web-based. I plan to locate several titles from the Kitsap Regional Library and the Seattle Public Library so that I have physical books and journals to re-reference as needed. Charts and statistics are an important part of the criminal justice systems and therefore I will continue to search for the most recent studies on statistics relating to criminal activity. Since the topic of prisoner rehabilitation and corrections is best told by those directly affected by it, I plan to do extensive field research for my project. I plan to seek interviews with Wardens and Assistant Wardens from local prisons, as well as prisons around the country. I am specifically interested in finding out what policies are in place for prison re-entry programs, and what stand-points prison officials have on the topic. An inmate in Louisiana State Penitentiary has already agreed to an interview regarding the academic achievements he has reached from within prison walls. He is the only prisoner in the state of Louisiana to receive a master’s degree while incarcerated, making him a highly credible, relevant source. I also plan to send a list of interview questions to a few other inmates in Louisiana State Penitentiary, as that prison, in particular, has a unique approach to inmate rehabilitation and I would like to hear personal accounts from the inmates who have benefited from the correctional techniques used there. In addition, I would like to interview prisoners who have taken part in re-entry programs within the justice system to see how, and if it has been to there benefit. Moreover, I would like to get the opinions of those prisoners on how they would like to see such correctional programs improved. I will set up interviews with parole officers to discuss the issue of criminal re-offending after release, and what exactly they do to try to prevent it. Further, I am hoping to interview ex-prisoners themselves to gain insight on how there criminal offence and prison stay has affected their lives as a free-man.

Project Timeline
I have until Friday June 6th, 2014 to complete my final research paper, however, a complete draft must be turned in on Tuesday May 20th, 2014 which gives me just less than one month to fully complete my research project. The first thing I will do in the upcoming week is compose a list of interview questions to send to prisoners in Louisiana State Penitentiary. I want to send those out as soon as possible to ensure a timely response. I will also look into getting in contact with locals prison personnel to see about possibly setting up live interviews with inmates and prison officials. Additionally, I will spend time in the library to gather books and set up any inter-library loans. I am anticipating having all of my sources gathered by the end of this week. In the meantime, I will begin writing my annotated bibliography. Throughout the week, I will make time to note the most significant chapters and passages from my sources and have them ready to annotate. I will have my annotated bibliography completed and ready to turn in on Tuesday May 6th, 2014. The following week, I will begin writing my review of literature which I will complete by Tuesday May 13th, 2014. This will give me a good foundation of familiarity with my topic and sources. I will begin drafting my final paper the week of May 13th, 2014, and will have a complete draft ready on May 20th. The following week I will continue refining my draft, adding any relevant information I may come across last minute. I will have a polished final paper ready to turn in on June 6th, 2014.

Working Bibliography

Austin, James. “Prisoner Reentry: Current Trends, Practices, and Issues” Crime and Delinquency 47.3 (2001): 314-334. Web. 24 Apr. 2014.

Benson, Etienne. “Rehabilitate Or Punish?” Monitor on Psychology July/August 2003: 46. American Psychological Association. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.

Cantrell, Dustin. “Correctional Education as Democratic Citizenship Education”. The Journal of Correctional Education 63.2 (2012): 27-36. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.

Crawford, Nicole. “Helping Inmates Cope With Prison Life” Monitor on Psychology July/August 2003: 62. American Psychological Association. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.

Green, Hank. “Mass Incarceration in the US” YouTube. YouTube. 4 Apr, 2014. Web. 22 Apr, 2014.

Henry, Stuart. “On the Effectiveness of Prison as Punishment” Conference: Incarceration Nation: The Warehousing of America’s Poor. 24 Oct, 2003. Ivy Tech State College, South Bend, Indiana. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.

Mauro, Marisa. “My Work as a Psychologist in Prison” Take All Prisoners. Psychology Today. 15 Apr. 2009. Web. 19 Apr. 2014.

Meares, Tracey L. “Mass Incarceration: Who Pays the Price for Criminal Offending?” January 1st, 2004. Faculty Scholarship Series. Web. 19. Apr. 2014.

Murray, Iain. “Making Rehabilitation Work: American Experience of Rehabilitating Prisoners.” 4 December, 2002. Web. 19 Apr. 2014

Murray, Joseph. “The Effects of Imprisonment on Families and Children Of Prisoners.” The Effects Of Imprisonment. Ed. Alison Liebling, Maruna Shadd. Cambridge Criminal Justice Series. Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge. Willian Publishing. 1 Sept. 2006. 442. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.

Pogorzelski, Wendy, et al. “Behavioral Health Problems, Ex-Offender Reentry Policies, and the ‘Second Chance Act’” American Journal of Public Health 95.10 (2005): 1718–1724. Web. 24 Apr. 2014

Public Safety Performance Project. “State of Recidivism: The Revolving Door of America’s Prisons” Pew Center on the States. Apr. 2011. Web. 22 Apr. 2011.

Solomon, Amy L. Johnson, et al. “From Prison to Work: The Employment Dimensions of Prisoner Reentry:  A Report of the Reentry Roundtable” Urban Institute.  Oct. 2004. Web. 20 Apr. 2014

Stanford Prison Experiment. Philip G. Zimbardo. 1999-2014. Web. 21 Apr. 2014.

Travis, Jeremy. “But They All Come Back: Facing the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry.” The Urban Institute Press. Google Books. 2005. Web. 20 Apr. 2014

Travis, Jeremy, Christy Visher. “Prisoner Reentry and Crime in America.” Cambridge University Press. Google Books. 2005. Web. 19 Apr. 2014

United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics. “Reentry Trends in the United States” Hughes, Timothy. Wilson, Doris James. Bureau of Justice Statistics. 14 Apr. 2004. Web. 22 Apr. 2014.

United States Department of Health and Human Services. “The Psychological Impact of Incarceration: Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment.” Haney, Craig. December, 2001. National Policy Conference. January 30-31, 2002. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD. 

Van Den Haag, Ernest. “Could Successful Rehabilitation Reduce the Crime Rate.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 73.3 (1982): 1022-1035. Web. 19 Apr. 2014

Weir, Kirsten. “Alone, In ‘The Hole’: Psychologists probe the mental health effects of solitary confinement.” Monitor on Psychology. May 2012: 54. American Psychological Association. Web. 21 Apr. 2014

Wildeman, Christopher, Bruce Western. “Incarceration in Fragile Families” Future of Children 20.2 (2010): 157-177. Web. 24 Apr. 2014



Monday, April 28, 2014

The Bedford Researcher- Chapter 12



Chapter 12 of The Bedford Researcher is about how to successfully develop your argument within your research project.  According to the book, the components for developing a valid argument include: Identifying reasons to accept your thesis statement, selecting evidence to support your reasoning, and deciding how you’ll appeal to your readers. While you come up with a strategy to support your thesis, it is always important to not only keep you purpose and role in mind, but also to keep the needs, interest, values, and beliefs of your readers in mind. Choosing reasons to support your argument is an import step of the writing process. For an argumentative paper, such as the one assigned to us in this class, TBR suggests to add a series of claims relevant to your topic in order to persuade your readers to accept your argument. For every reason you include, you will, of course, need evidence to back it up.  Evidence can include details, facts, personal observations, and expert opinions. Finally, you will need to decide how to appeal to your readers. You can do this in a variety of ways such as using appeals to authority, emotion, principals, values, and beliefs, character, and logic. You can use these appeals individually, or mix them. For example, you can mix emotional appeals with character appeals. Section B of chapter 12 discusses assessing the integrity of your argument. TBR suggest you do this by making sure your argument does not include common fallacies such as fallacies based on distraction, questionable assumptions, misrepresentation, and careless reasoning.

Monday, April 21, 2014

Working Bibliography- 20 Sources

Working Bibliography

Benson, Etienne. “Rehabilitate Or Punish?”.  Monitor on Psychology Vol 34, No. 7. American Psychological Association. July, 2003. Web.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. Huges, Timothy. Wilson, Doris James.  “Reentry Trends in the United States” Bureau of Justice Statistics. April 14th, 2004. Web.

Cantrell, Dustin. “Correctional Education as Democratic Citizenship Education”. The Journal of Correctional Education. September 2012.

Crawford, Nicole. “Helping Inmates Cope With Prison Life”.  Monitor on Psychology. Vol 34, No. 7. American Psychological Association. July/August 2003. Web.

Green, Hank. “Mass Incarceration in the US”.  Youtube. Youtube, April 4, 2014.

Haney, Craig. “The Psychological Impact of Incarceration: Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment.” Prisoners Once Removed: The Impact of Incarceration and Reentry on Children, Families, and Communities. The Urban Institute Press. 2003.

Henry, Stuart. “On the Effectiveness of Prison as Punishment.” Conference: Incarceration Nation: The Warehousing of America’s Poor. October 24, 2003. Ivy Tech State College, South Bend, Indiana. Web.

Mauro, Marisa. “My Work as a Psychologist in Prison” Take All Prisoners. Psychology Today. April 15, 2009. Web.

Meares, Tracey L. “Mass Incarceration: Who Pays the Price for Criminal Offending?” January 1st, 2004. Faculty Scholarship Series. Web.

Murray, Iain. “Making Rehabilitation Work: American Experience of Rehabilitating Prisoners.” 4 December, 2002. Web.

Murray, Joseph. “The Effects of Imprisonment On Families and Children Of Prisoners.” The Effects Of Imprisonment. Ed. Liebling, Alison. Shadd Maruna. Cambridge Criminal Justice Series. Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge. Willian Publishing. September 1, 2006.

Public Safety Performance Project. “State of Recidivism: The Revolving Door of America’s Prisons” Pew Center on the States. April, 2011.

Reclaimingjournal.com. “Fernando's' Long Journey Home”. Developmental Audit. Spring 2013. Web

Solomon, Amy L. Johnson, Kelly Dedel. Travis, Jeremy. McBride, Elizabeth C. “From Prison to Work: The Employment Dimensions of Prisoner Reentry:  A Report of the Reentry Roundtable” Urban Institute.  October, 2004.

Stanford Prison Experiment. Philip G. Zimbardo. 1999-2014. Web. April 21, 2014.

Travis, Jeremy. “But They All Come Back: Facing the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry.” The Urban Institute Press. Google Books. 2005.

Travis, Jeremy. Visher, Christy. "Prisoner Reentry and Crime in America.” Cambridge University Press. Google Books. 2005.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. “The Psychological Impact of Incarceration: Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment.” Haney, Craig. December, 2001. National Policy Conference. January 30-31, 2002. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD. 

Van Den Haag, Ernest. “Could Successful Rehabilitation Reduce the Crime Rate.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 73 Issue 3 Fall. 1982. Web.

Weir, Kirsten. “Alone, In ‘The Hole’: Psychologists probe the mental health effects of solitary confinement.” Monitor on Psychology. Vol. 43, No. 5. American Psychological Association. May 2012. Web.

The Bedford Researcher- Chapter 7


Chapter 7 of The Bedford Researcher provides detailed tips on how to avoid plagiarism. The text discusses the differences between intentional and unintentional plagiarism. For example you unintentionally commit plagiarism if you forget to put quotations around a direct quotation in your paper, if you include a paraphrase that is worded almost exactly the same as an original quote, you default on clearly differentiating your ideas from the ideas of others, or you do not list a referred source in your “works cited" list. Intentionally committing plagiarism would be to purposely copy a passage from a source, copy an entire document and passing it off as a work of your own, or creating a fake citation to mislead your readers. TBR discusses research ethic which, according to the book, means keeping an “honest exchange of information, ideas, and arguments among writers and reader who share an interest in an issue.” The book also discusses the use of common knowledge within your paper. Common knowledge is information that is widely known, and therefore does not need a citation. Including common knowledge in your project is not considered plagiarism. The most important section of this chapter is on how to avoid plagiarism all together. The book stresses the importance of taking good notes In order to keep your ideas separate from those you found in a source. Conducting a knowledge inventory about your topic will help you to ensure you have a clear understanding of your issue. To do this, first ask yourself what  you already know about the issue. Next ask yourself what you do not know. Finally, ask yourself what you want to know. By carefully taking notes, and ensuring you have a good grip of knowledge on your topic, your chances of accidentally committing plagiarism will be much less.

The Bedford Researcher- Chapter 11

Chapter 11 of The Bedford researcher is about developing a strong, focused thesis statement. You can use your position statement as a foundation for building your thesis statement. According to TBR, your thesis statement should provide a clear, focused expression of the main point you want to make in your research paper. Reviewing your position statement, notes, and considering your purpose and role as a writer will help you to build a good thesis statement. Of course, your position statement and opinions may have changed during your research project. Revise your position statement and re-consider your roles and purpose before attempting to come up with a thesis. You should always keep your readers concerns in mind as you revise your position statement and thesis. When drafting your thesis statement, it is also wise to consider your writing situation, and the type of document you plan to write. Since the project in this class is specific to an academic research project, our thesis statement should be a clearly written statement of what our position on the topic is, and what we want our readers to learn, believe, or do. Clearly focusing your thesis statement is the key to encouraging your readers to learn something new, change their beliefs, and take action on an issue. 

Chapter 10- The Bedford Researcher

Chapter 10 of The Bedford Researcher discusses the significance of field research. Field research can be conducted in several forms such as interviews, observations, and surveys. Field research is an important part of any research project, as it can grasp the opinions, thoughts, and beliefs of those who have been directly affected by the issue you are writing about.

Deciding who to interview will be the first step as you plan your interview. When you are conducting an interview, TBR suggests you keep in mind your research question, the role you are adopting, and the kind of information you want to collect. Next, you should decide how to conduct the interview, for example, face-to-face, by telephone, or a written interview. Keep in mind the pros-and-cons of each interview method. Recording your interview and taking notes will be the most important part of the interview process. When you are finished, you should go back and analyze the results as your would any other source.

Similar to interviewing, observing a live situation pertaining to your issue can be incredibly useful. It can provide valuable, first-hand information you would likely not be able to find through other sources. If it would be useful  to conduct several observations, in different settings, you should do so. TBR suggests you keep your reasons for conducting an observation, and what you hope to gain from it in deciding what to focus on during the observation.

Surveying is another form of field research that may be useful to your research project. They are helpful in answering the “what” and “who” questions, such as, “who will vote for the next election?”  Surveys are not always the most useful form of field research. However, if you are trying to collect information about the attitudes and behaviors of a large group of people, surveying may be a great option. TBR suggests you ask your question clearly, and with integrity.

The bottom line for this chapter is to not underestimate the power of field research. It can give you first-hand knowledge that  would be difficult to capture simply using the internet, books, newspaper, or magazines. 

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

Working Bibliography (In Progress)

Working Bibliography

Henry, Stuart. “On the Effectiveness of Prison as Punishment.” Conference: Incarceration Nation: The Warehousing of America’s Poor. October 24, 2003. Ivy Tech State College, South Bend, Indiana. Web.

Meares, Tracey L. “Mass Incarceration: Who Pays the Price for Criminal Offending?” January 1st, 2004. Faculty Scholarship Series. Web.

Murray, Iain. “Making Rehabilitation Work: American Experience of Rehabilitating Prisoners.” 4 December, 2002. Web.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. “The Psychological Impact of Incarceration: Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment.” Haney, Craig. December, 2001. National Policy Conference. January 30-31, 2002. National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD.  

Van Den Haag, Ernest. “Could Successful Rehabilitation Reduce the Crime Rate.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Volume 73 Issue 3 Fall. 1982. Web.



Signal Phrases- In Class Lab

Example sentence #1
In his report "The Psychological Impact of Incarceration: Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment" written for the Nation Policy Conference, Dr. Craig Haney, professor of Psychology from the University of California- Santa Cruz writes “Prisons do not, in general, make people ‘crazy.’ However, even researchers who are openly skeptical about whether the pains of imprisonment generally translate into psychological harm concede that, for at least some people, prison can produce negative, long-lasting change… the more extreme, harsh, dangerous, or otherwise psychologically-taxing the nature of the confinement, the greater the number of people who will suffer and the deeper the damage that they will incur.”

Example sentence #2
In his report “Making Rehabilitation Work: American Experience of Rehabilitating Prisoners” Iain Murray, Director of Research for Statistical Assessment Service in Washington DC writes “Criminal offending and re-offending is a tangled web woven from a complex set of circumstances and choices… The best rehabilitation programs recognize this problem, and seek to untangle the web appropriately.” 

Example Paragraph 
As soon as a criminal is convicted and sentenced to a long, or short term prison stay, that criminal is bound to undergo sevear psychological changes. There are many factors that contribute to these changes. In his report "The Psychological Impact of Incarceration: Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment" written for the Nation Policy Conference, Dr. Craig Haney, professor of Psychology from the University of California- Santa Cruz writes "The combination of overcrowding and the rapid expansion of prison systems across the country adversely affected living conditions in many prisons, jeopardized prisoner safety, compromised prison management, and greatly limited prisoner access to meaningful programming."(3) Due to these harmful factors, prisoners across the country have begun to show a pattern of negative effects. Haney continues, "At the very least, prison is painful, and incarcerated persons often suffer long-term consequences from having been subjected to pain, deprivation, and extremely atypical patterns and norms of living and interacting with others."(4-5) Harsh Punishment in prison in one of the main factors contributing to negative psychological effects among criminals. In his report “On the Effectiveness of Prison as Punishment” professor and Chair of Interdisciplinary Studies, Dr. Stuart Henry writes “…punishment, especially in its severe form has several negative effects:
1.      Avoidance or escape
2.      Alienation of those punished, to the point of inaction
3.      Aggressiveness, both targeted and generalized, by those punished
4.      Conditioning of the punishers through rewarding them for behavioral change
5.      Reproducing punishment behavior in those punished”  



Five Sources and Evaluations

~Source #1~
http://www.is.wayne.edu/StuartHenry/Effectiveness_of_Punishment.htm
Domain:
Edu (higher education)
Title Bar/Page Header/Page Titles: 
"On the effectiveness of prison as punishment"
Info About the Author: 
  • Stuart Henry, Ph.D.
  • Areas of interest: Criminological Theory, Deviant Behavior, Law and Society and Occupational Crime
  • B.A. Ph.D. University of Kent at Canterbury
Timeliness:
Study was published October 24, 2003
Body Text Overview:.
This paper questions the effectiveness of punishment among criminal offenders. The author discuses studies that provide evidence of the negative effects of severe punishment, and the positive effects of mild, consistent punishment with positive reinforcement. The author provides counter-arguments to pro-punishment advocates. Charts and statistics on criminals are included.

~Source #2~
http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6327&context=jclc
Domain:  
Edu (higher education)
Title Bar/Page Header/Page Titles:
"Could Successful Rehabilitation Reduce the Crime Rate"
Info About the Author:
  • Ernest van den Haag
  • Dutch-American sociologist, social critic, and John M. Olin Professor of Jurisprudence and Public Policy at Fordham University
  • Awards include the Guggenheim Fellowship for Social Sciences, US & Canada
Timeliness:
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Published Fall, 1982
Body Text Overview:
The author bases this journal article around the question "What is the likely effect of rehabilitation on the crime rate?". The author discusses several types of offenders, and who is most likley to benefit from rehabilitation within the prison system. Realistic rehabilitation vs non-realistic rehabilitation is addressed. 

~Source #3~
http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/Rehab.pdf
Domain: 
Org (nonprofit organization) 
Title Bar/Page Header/Page Titles:
"Making Rehabilitation Work: American Experience of Rehabilitating Prisoners"
Info About the Author: 
  • Iain Murray 
  • Director of Research, Statistical Assessment Service, Washington DC
Timeliness:
Article published  December 4th, 2002
Body Text Overview:
This is an article by a British author who is discussing rehabilitation within the American prison system. He addresses many points in favor of rehabilitation, and also includes arguments made by those who are pro-punishment. He argues his point that if rehabilitation helps to prevent even a small amount of crime committed by those who are released from prison, then it is nevertheless, an important part of the correctional process.

~Source #4~
http://img2.timg.co.il/CommunaFiles/19852476.pdf
Domain: 
co.il
Title Bar/Page Header/Page Titles:
"The Psychological Impact of Incarceration: Implications for Post-Prison Adjustment"
Info About the Author:
  • Craig Haney
  • M.A., Ph.D., J.D., Stanford University, B.A., University of Pennsylvania
  • Professor. Social Sciences Division-Psychology Department.
  • University of California: Santa Cruz
Timeliness:
Published December, 2001
Body Text Overview:
The author examines the psychological changes that criminals endure within the prison system. He discusses the effect these psychological factors have on the potential re-entry of criminals into the free world. The trend of increasingly harsh policies in prison, and the lack of rehabilitation are addressed.

~Source #5~
http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1521&context=fss_papers
Domain: 
Edu (higher education)
Title Bar/Page Header/Page Titles:
Mass Incarceration: Who Pays the Price for Criminal Offending?
Info About the Author:
  • Tracey L. Meares
  • J.D., University of Chicago, 1991
  • B.S., University of Illinois, 1988
  • Professor at Yale Law School
  • Teaches Criminal Law and Administration, Criminal Procedure
Timeliness:
Published January, 2004
Body Text Overview:
The author of this essay discusses the high cost of mass incarceration in America, and how it affects society, and families of those who are incarcerated. The author expresses the concern that mass incarceration is not lowering the crime rate. Prison policy on how they are rehabilitating prisoners and preparing them for re-entry into society is addressed.